In re Tianna M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tianna M.

232 A.D.2d 330, 648 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11186

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D.2d 330 (In re Tianna M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tianna M., 232 A.D.2d 330, 648 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about March 20, 1996, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent and placed her with the Division for Youth in a limited service facility for a period not to exceed 18 months, following a fact-finding determination that respondent had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence that respondent accompanied the other perpetrators in approaching the victim, remained present during the robbery, alerted the others to "break it off’ upon the arrival of the police, and fled with the others (see, Matter of Carmelo N., 228 AD2d 682). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about March 20, 1996, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent and placed her with the Division for Youth in a limited service facility for a period not to exceed 18 months, following a fact-finding determination that respondent had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence that respondent accompanied the other perpetrators in approaching the victim, remained present during the robbery, alerted the others to "break it off’ upon the arrival of the police, and fled with the others (see, Matter of Carmelo N., 228 AD2d 682). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D.2d 330, 648 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tianna-m-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack