In re Tianna B. - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided July 6, 2016·No. E2015-02189-COA-R3-PT·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 2, 2016

IN RE TIANNA B.

Appeal from the Hamilton County Juvenile Court No. 263525 Robert D. Philyaw, Judge

No. E2015-02189-COA-R3-PT FILED-JULY 6, 2016

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur completely in the majority’s opinion terminating the parental rights of Myron J. T. based upon the provisions of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(1) and § 36-1- 102(1)(A)(i). I dissent from so much of the majority’s decision as holds that father does not fall within the ambit of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A) and § 36-1-117(c). I would hold that father is within the class of persons covered by these latter two statutes. On this point, I adhere to the majority opinion authored by me in the case of In re F.N.M., No. M2015-00519-COA-R3-PT, 2016 WL 3126077 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed Apr. 11, 2016).

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tianna B. - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

In re Tianna B. - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part (In re Tianna B. - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 36-1-113
Tennessee § 36-1-113(g)(1)