In re Thyne

167 A.3d 1286, 230 N.J. 377, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 838
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 11, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-068, concluding that KENNETH S. THYNE of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2)(conflict of interest with a client), RPC 1.10(a)(imputation of conflict of interest), and RPC 8.4(d)(eonduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH S. THYNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Thyne, 167 A.3d 1286, 230 N.J. 377, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 838 (N.J. 2017).

167 A.3d 1286 (In re Thyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.