In re Thyne

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Thyne

67 A.3d 620, 214 N.J. 107, 2013 WL 3305766, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 600

DecidedJune 27, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.3d 620 (In re Thyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thyne, 67 A.3d 620, 214 N.J. 107, 2013 WL 3305766, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 600 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-348, concluding that KENNETH S. THYNE, of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal); RPC 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a bar admission application or in connection with a disciplinary matter); RPC 8.1(b) (failing to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation known by the person to have arisen in the matter);

[108]*108And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH S. THYNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-348, concluding that KENNETH S. THYNE, of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal); RPC 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a bar admission application or in connection with a disciplinary matter); RPC 8.1(b) (failing to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation known by the person to have arisen in the matter);

[108]*108And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH S. THYNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.3d 620, 214 N.J. 107, 2013 WL 3305766, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thyne-nj-2013.