In re Three Sofia Bros.

190 Misc. 891, 76 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3585
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 17, 1947·Published

Opinion

Pecora, J.

The claim here is that respondent’s property was damaged while petitioner was moving furniture on August 30, 1941. The moving was being done pursuant to a contract entered into between the parties on August 12,1941. The three-year Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6) referring to actions to recover damages for injury to property resulting from negligence, does not apply. The claim here arises from an agreement between the parties and not from a violation of a duty imposed by law. (See Busch v. Interborough R. T. Co., 187 N. Y. 388.) The six-year statute as to contract actions (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48) is applicable. Service of the demand for arbitration on August 30, 1947, was therefore timely. (Pomeranz v. More, 187 Misc. 383.) The motion to stay arbitration is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Three Sofia Bros., 190 Misc. 891, 76 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3585 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1947).

190 Misc. 891 (In re Three Sofia Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
80 N.E. 197 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Pomeranz v. More
187 Misc. 383 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1946)