In re Thorsness

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Thorsness

214 Ill. 2d 568

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketMR 19952

StatusPublished

This text of 214 Ill. 2d 568 (In re Thorsness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thorsness, 214 Ill. 2d 568 (Ill. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondents William Warren Thorsness II and Gregory Francis Smith are each suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Suspensions effective April 8, 2005.

Respondent William Warren Thorsness II shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondents William Warren Thorsness II and Gregory Francis Smith are each suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Suspensions effective April 8, 2005.

Respondent William Warren Thorsness II shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 Ill. 2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thorsness-ill-2005.