in Re: Thornton Ray Prophet

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 2002
Docket01-02-00610-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Thornton Ray Prophet (in Re: Thornton Ray Prophet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Thornton Ray Prophet, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued June 20, 2002





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-00610-CV



IN RE THORNTON RAY PROPHET, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that we direct respondent (1) to grant relator's motion to dismiss the indictment in cause number 262195 for failure of the State to afford him a speedy trial. In his petition, relator seems to be laboring under the belief that: (1) he is serving a 99-year sentence on a charge for which he has never been tried, and (2) the charge is 25 years old. This is false.

Relator filed a postconviction application for habeas corpus in the Court of Criminal Appeals. That court wrote:

Petitioner [Thornton Ray Prophet] waived trial by jury and was convicted of attempted aggravated rape on May 26, 1978. Having found that petitioner had been once previously convicted of a felony, the trial court assessed punishment at ninety-nine (99) years' imprisonment.



Ex parte Prophet, 601 S.W.2d 372, 373 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). According to Harris County records, relator was convicted of attempted aggravated rape and sentenced to 99 years confinement after waiving trial by jury in cause number 262195. The conviction was appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals, which issued its mandate of affirmance in 1979.

Relator has not established his right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Taft, and Smith. (2)

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

Respondent is the Honorable Brian Rains, Judge, 176th District Court, Harris County, Texas.

2.

The Honorable Jackson B. Smith, Jr., retired Justice, Court of Appeals, First District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Prophet
601 S.W.2d 372 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Thornton Ray Prophet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thornton-ray-prophet-texapp-2002.