In re Thomson Wood Finishing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Thomson Wood Finishing Co.

240 A.D. 910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 910 (In re Thomson Wood Finishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thomson Wood Finishing Co., 240 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate notice of mechanic’s lien reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Under the terms of the contract, the contractor, Aratzkoff, was entitled to his final payment on the Thomas Jefferson High School work upon the completion of such work, on August 2, 1932, without reference to the work to be performed on any other building or buildings covered by said contract, and the respondents’ time within which to file a notice of mechanic’s lien began to run on that date, and, not having filed a notice of lien until February, 1933, they have no lien upon the premises for moneys due the contractor by the city under the Aratzkoff contract. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to vacate notice of mechanic’s lien reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Under the terms of the contract, the contractor, Aratzkoff, was entitled to his final payment on the Thomas Jefferson High School work upon the completion of such work, on August 2, 1932, without reference to the work to be performed on any other building or buildings covered by said contract, and the respondents’ time within which to file a notice of mechanic’s lien began to run on that date, and, not having filed a notice of lien until February, 1933, they have no lien upon the premises for moneys due the contractor by the city under the Aratzkoff contract. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomson-wood-finishing-co-nyappdiv-1933.