In Re: Thompson's Estate

199 So. 352, 145 Fla. 42
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 199 So. 352 (In Re: Thompson's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Thompson's Estate, 199 So. 352, 145 Fla. 42 (Fla. 1940).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, *44 Mi-. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Thomas are of opinion that the order of the circuit court in this cause should be affirmed while' Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Chapman are of opinion that the said-order should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme- Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the order should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the order should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the order of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman, and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lackner v. Central Florida Investments, Inc.
14 So. 3d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Bell v. Bell
307 So. 2d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
In Re Estate of Alcala
188 So. 2d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Beacher v. Baecher
177 So. 2d 838 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Chivers v. Couch Motor Lines, Inc.
159 So. 2d 544 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Josephson v. Kuhner
139 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Spinder v. Bobier
134 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Disbro v. Boyce
124 So. 2d 756 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Cannova v. Carran
92 So. 2d 614 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
In re Parker's Estate
8 Fla. Supp. 186 (Sarasota County Circuit Court, 1956)
Chaachou v. Chaachou
73 So. 2d 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
In Re Colson's Estate
72 So. 2d 57 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
State ex rel. West v. Gray
70 So. 2d 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
In Re Wilmott's Estate
66 So. 2d 465 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
In Re Williams'estate
59 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Lambrose v. Topham
55 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Mayer v. Mayer
54 So. 2d 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
In Re: Estate of Lorenzo
35 So. 2d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Miller v. Nelson
35 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Moore v. Fitzgerald
26 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 352, 145 Fla. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thompsons-estate-fla-1940.