In re Thompson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Thompson

97 A.3d 263, 219 N.J. 127, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 884

DecidedSeptember 5, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.3d 263 (In re Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thompson, 97 A.3d 263, 219 N.J. 127, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 884 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in. DRB 13-401, concluding that RONALD B. THOMPSON of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of the matter or to promptly reply to reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RONALD B. THOMPSON is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in. DRB 13-401, concluding that RONALD B. THOMPSON of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of the matter or to promptly reply to reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RONALD B. THOMPSON is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.3d 263, 219 N.J. 127, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thompson-nj-2014.