In Re Thompson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Thompson

988 A.2d 477, 2010 WL 374114

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 4, 2010

Docket09-BG-1284

StatusPublished

This text of 988 A.2d 477 (In Re Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Thompson, 988 A.2d 477, 2010 WL 374114 (D.C. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals placing respondent on inactive status by consent for an indefinite period of time owing to the onset of a medical disability, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Thompson, Misc. Docket AG No. 41, 411 Md. 82, 981 A.2d 1234 (2009), this court’s November 18, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law in this jurisdiction pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause, it is

*478 ORDERED that Richard Lloyd Thompson, III, is hereby indefinitely voluntarily suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing that his disability has ended and he is fit to resume the practice of law. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g); In re Cornish, 691 A.2d 156, 157 (D.C.1997). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will be deemed to run from the date on which he files an affidavit compliant with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals placing respondent on inactive status by consent for an indefinite period of time owing to the onset of a medical disability, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Thompson, Misc. Docket AG No. 41, 411 Md. 82, 981 A.2d 1234 (2009), this court’s November 18, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law in this jurisdiction pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause, it is

*478 ORDERED that Richard Lloyd Thompson, III, is hereby indefinitely voluntarily suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing that his disability has ended and he is fit to resume the practice of law. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g); In re Cornish, 691 A.2d 156, 157 (D.C.1997). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will be deemed to run from the date on which he files an affidavit compliant with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

988 A.2d 477, 2010 WL 374114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thompson-dc-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack