in Re Thomas Retzlaff
This text of in Re Thomas Retzlaff (in Re Thomas Retzlaff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-18-00093-CV _________________
IN RE THOMAS RETZLAFF
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. B-199,953-A ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Thomas Retzlaff, a vexatious litigant, filed a petition for issuance of a writ of
mandamus and a motion for temporary relief from the local administrative judge’s
denial of leave to file an intervention. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §
11.102(f) (West 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a). The relator has not shown
that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the mandamus petition and
motion for temporary relief are denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). The motion to
dismiss filed by the real parties in interest, Klein Investigations and Consulting, a
Division of Klein Investments, Inc., and Klein Investments, Inc., is denied. Relator’s
motion to strike Klein’s response and Amended Motion for Emergency Stay are also
denied.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 12, 2018 Opinion Delivered March 13, 2018
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Thomas Retzlaff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-retzlaff-texapp-2018.