In re Thomas

53 A.D.2d 598, 385 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13257

This text of 53 A.D.2d 598 (In re Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Thomas, 53 A.D.2d 598, 385 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In this proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney, upon charges of misconduct, respondent has submitted an affidavit dated April 29, 1976 in which he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor at law. Respondent was admitted to the Bar by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, on April 2, 1951. The petition alleged two allegations of professional misconduct against respondent. Under the first specification of the charges respondent was accused of converting to his own use $7,350 of his clients’ money which he was to hold in escrow. The second specification charges respondent with neglecting to properly represent his clients by failing to commence an action to recover a down payment of $8,300; deceiving his clients by falsely informing them that he had commenced such an action and had filed a notice of pendency of action against the property; and failing to account for or to return $950 advanced to him by his clients. The respondent states in his affidavit that his resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered; that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress; that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation; and he acknowledges that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against all of the charges which are comprehended by the petition in this proceeding. Under the circumstances herein, respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that respondent’s name be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.2d 598, 385 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-nyappdiv-1976.