In re Thomas
This text of 128 A.D. 330 (In re Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This application was made upon the petition of one Isadora P. Thomas, a citizen of the State of New York and an enrolled member of the Independence League party of the twenty-sixth Assembly district. It appears from that petition that the Independence League nominated a candidate for member of Assembly and filed the said certificate of nomination with the board of elections of the,city of New York ; that thereafter there was filed with the board a pretended nomination of one Aaron Morris for the same office. The board of elections overruled the objections to the Morris candidacy and directed that Morris be placed upon- the official ballot as a candidate for member of Assembly.
It appeared that the chairman of the Independence League county committee of the county of New York chose Isadore P. Thomas as the person by whom the convention of the Independence League party, to be held on the 3d of October, 1908, at No. 1677 Madison avenue to nominate a candidate for member of Assembly from the said district, should be called to order. From what purport to be minutes of conventions to nominate a candidate for member of Assembly in the twenty-sixth Assembly district it would appear that three conventions were held. Two of these conven[332]*332tions appear to have nominated Morris as a candidate for member of Assembly and the other convention nominated one William Hoffman. In one of the Morris certificates it is stated that Dr. Isadore P. Thomas, the person designated in writing by the chairman of the Independence League county committee, from whom the call for the said convention originated, not being present, David Shoenstein called the convention to order and Max Freeland was nominated as temporary chairman ; that the roll of the convention as shown by a list annexed was then called by David Shoenstein and each delegate rising in his place declared his choice for Max Freeland as temporary chairman.
By subdivision 4 of section 8 of the Primary Election Law (Laws of 1898, chap. 179, as amd. by Laws of 1899, chap, 473) the custodian of primary records
[333]*333There is another certificate filed which is signed by the same officers as permanent chairman and permanent secretary as the certificate before mentioned and which nominated the same candidate, and this recites that Dr. Isadore P. Thomas, the person designated in writing by the chairman of the Independence League county committee, called the convention to order and? that on the call of the roll of the convention as shown upon a list annexed a temporary chairman was elected. But this was riot the call of the official roll of the convention but a list of names which is annexed to the minutes of the alleged ^convention. But there was evidence before the board and it was not disputed upon this appeal that neither the chairman of the county committee nor a person designated by him did as a fact call this convention to order and there is no evidence that a roll of the convention prepared by the board of elections was present or that the names annexed to the minutes of the meeting was the list of delegates duly elected to' the convention. For the same reason this convention, if it is a different convention from the first convention considered, did not comply with the statute, was never organized as therein provided, and was thus unable to make a valid nomination. It seems, therefore, that from the papers before us there was no nomination for member of Assembly by the Independence League for the twenty-sixth Assembly district in the city of Hew York, and the board of elections should not have placed the name of Morris upon the official ballot as the nominee of the Independence League for member of Assembly in that district.
The question of-.the nomination of Hoffman is not before us, as he does not claim to be entitled to be placed on the ballot.
It follows that the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and the application granted.
Present—Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and application granted.
In the city of Ñew York the board of elections is such custodian. (Primary Election Law, § 2, as amd. by Laws of 1899, chap. 473; Election Law [Laws of 1896, chap. 909], §§ 86, 87, as amd. by Laws of 1905, chap. 643.).— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 A.D. 330, 112 N.Y.S. 664, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-nyappdiv-1908.