In re Thomas

886 A.2d 1052, 185 N.J. 394, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1612
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 N.J. 345
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 7, 2005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-223, concluding that CHARLES R. THOMAS of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES R. THOMAS is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Thomas, 886 A.2d 1052, 185 N.J. 394, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1612 (N.J. 2005).

886 A.2d 1052 (In re Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.