In re Thomas

655 A.2d 71, 139 N.J. 388, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 101
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 23, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 655 A.2d 71 (In re Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Thomas, 655 A.2d 71, 139 N.J. 388, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 101 (N.J. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that THOMAS A. McKINNEY of HAWTHORNE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(b) and (c) by failing to notify his client of the receipt of settlement funds and by disbursing funds he knew were in dispute, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and THOMAS A. McKINNEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject of respondent’s fee be referred to a fee arbitration committee for its consideration and an appropriate disposition; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sommers v. McKinney
670 A.2d 99 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 A.2d 71, 139 N.J. 388, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-nj-1995.