in Re Thomas Lee Fifer

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 14, 2011·No. 01-11-00538-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 14, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-00538-CR

———————————

In re Thomas Lee Fifer, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Relator, Thomas Lee Fifer, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court has failed to rule on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.[1] 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus, and we dismiss all outstanding motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



[1]           A jury found relator guilty of the offense of aggravated assault in State v. Fifer, No. 1117100, in the 184th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jan Krocker presiding.  This Court modified the trial court’s judgment to clarify the Penal Code provision under which relator was convicted, and then affirmed the trial court’s judgment as modified.  See Fifer v. State, No. 01-07-00894-CR, 2008 WL 4530720, at *4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 9, 2008, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Thomas Lee Fifer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Thomas Lee Fifer (in Re Thomas Lee Fifer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.