In re Thomas
This text of 221 Ill. 2d 711 (In re Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Court:
The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Juan R. Thomas is suspended from the practice of law for ninety (90) days. Suspension effective October 12, 2006. Respondent Juan R. Thomas shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension. Order entered by the Court.
Thomas, C.J., and Garman J., dissenting.
Chief Justice Thomas and Justice Garman would deny the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 Ill. 2d 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-ill-2006.