In re Thomas

931 A.2d 1038, 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 554, 2007 WL 2385067
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 23, 2007
DocketNo. 06-BG-1094
StatusPublished

This text of 931 A.2d 1038 (In re Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Thomas, 931 A.2d 1038, 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 554, 2007 WL 2385067 (D.C. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e) and Bar Counsel having interposed no objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that the pending reciprocal matter based on respondent’s three-year suspension in Louisiana be held in abeyance until further order of the Court pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c) and (e). The pending reciprocal matter should be reactivated when it is determined that respondent is no longer disabled, and is fit to resume the practice of law and assist in his defense. Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g). It is

[1039]*1039FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s suspension shall not deem to commence, for reinstatement purposes until he file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the Court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Bar Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
931 A.2d 1038, 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 554, 2007 WL 2385067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-dc-2007.