In re Thomas

Sixth Circuit

In re Thomas

87 F. 453, 12 Ohio F. Dec. 82, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1814

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1898

DocketNo. 522

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 87 F. 453 (In re Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thomas, 87 F. 453, 12 Ohio F. Dec. 82, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1814 (6th Cir. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of Taft, circuit judge, who heard the case in the court below. His opinion is reported in 82 Fed. 304. With respect to the question of law involved, we concur in the reasoning upon which Judge Taft’s opinion proceeds (and which we are content to adopt as our own), and in the conclusion which he reached, save that we prefer to resi our approval of the order made by the court below upon the ground that, inasmuch as the legislature of Ohio had no power to regulate (he conduct of this administrative agency of the national government by such a statute as is here in question, it ought to be presumed that the legislature did not intend it to have such au application, and that the statute should be construed accordingly. The order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of Taft, circuit judge, who heard the case in the court below. His opinion is reported in 82 Fed. 304. With respect to the question of law involved, we concur in the reasoning upon which Judge Taft’s opinion proceeds (and which we are content to adopt as our own), and in the conclusion which he reached, save that we prefer to resi our approval of the order made by the court below upon the ground that, inasmuch as the legislature of Ohio had no power to regulate (he conduct of this administrative agency of the national government by such a statute as is here in question, it ought to be presumed that the legislature did not intend it to have such au application, and that the statute should be construed accordingly. The order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 F. 453, 12 Ohio F. Dec. 82, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thomas-ca6-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack