In re Thirty-Fifth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Thirty-Fifth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury

158 A.3d 617, 638 Pa. 685, 2015 WL 13239885, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 134

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 2015·No. No. 197 MM 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. The parties are DIRECTED to file supplemental briefs discussing, inter alia, the apparent conflict between Smith v. Gallagher, 408 Pa. 551, 185 A.2d 135, 137 (1962), and In re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand Jury, 610 Pa. 296, 19 A.3d 491 (2011), and the legislative history surrounding the appointment of special prosecutors. See, e.g., 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 9301 et seq. (expired Feb. 18,2003).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish an expedited briefing schedule for the supplemental briefs and to list this matter for oral argument at this Court’s March 2015 session.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. The parties are DIRECTED to file supplemental briefs discussing, inter alia, the apparent conflict between Smith v. Gallagher, 408 Pa. 551, 185 A.2d 135, 137 (1962), and In re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand Jury, 610 Pa. 296, 19 A.3d 491 (2011), and the legislative history surrounding the appointment of special prosecutors. See, e.g., 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 9301 et seq. (expired Feb. 18,2003).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish an expedited briefing schedule for the supplemental briefs and to list this matter for oral argument at this Court’s March 2015 session.

In re Thirty-Fifth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 158 A.3d 617, 638 Pa. 685, 2015 WL 13239885, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 134 (Pa. 2015).

Pincite

158 A.3d 617 (In re Thirty-Fifth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related