In re Thies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Thies

61 A.D.2d 1037, 403 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 1037 (In re Thies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thies, 61 A.D.2d 1037, 403 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, its decision dated March 13, 1978 is amended by striking from the first decretal paragraph everything following the words "Motion granted” and by substituting the following: "The respondent, admitted to practice before the Bar by this court on December 16, 1959, was convicted of a felony (violation of US Code, tit. 18, § 111), assault upon a federal officer, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on November 22, 1976.” That judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in December, 1977. This court’s order dated March 13, 1978, entered on the decision is amended accordingly. The judgment of conviction in the same court on February 28, 1977 (violation of US Code, tit 18, § 371) for conspiracy to sell stolen securities and the sale of stolen securities, as set forth in this court’s decision dated March 13, 1978, was subsequently vacated by order of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, dated January 23, 1978, and thus was not the [1038]*1038ground upon which the respondent was disbarred. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the court’s own motion, its decision dated March 13, 1978 is amended by striking from the first decretal paragraph everything following the words "Motion granted” and by substituting the following: "The respondent, admitted to practice before the Bar by this court on December 16, 1959, was convicted of a felony (violation of US Code, tit. 18, § 111), assault upon a federal officer, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on November 22, 1976.” That judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in December, 1977. This court’s order dated March 13, 1978, entered on the decision is amended accordingly. The judgment of conviction in the same court on February 28, 1977 (violation of US Code, tit 18, § 371) for conspiracy to sell stolen securities and the sale of stolen securities, as set forth in this court’s decision dated March 13, 1978, was subsequently vacated by order of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, dated January 23, 1978, and thus was not the [1038]*1038ground upon which the respondent was disbarred. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 1037, 403 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thies-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack