In re Thiele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Thiele

159 A.D. 887, 143 N.Y.S. 1011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D. 887 (In re Thiele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thiele, 159 A.D. 887, 143 N.Y.S. 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This controversy seems to be principally a dispute between two attorneys at law who have dissolved partnership. It appears by the answer of the respondent that he has commenced an action against his former partner for an accounting and he claims that on that accounting a balance will be found due him. I am inclined to think that these proceedings should be suspended so as to give the respondent a reasonable time to bring on his action against his partner and thus have the dispute tried out in that action rather than in these proceedings. If the respondent fails to bring on that action for hearing within a reasonable time, or after the decision of the court in that action, the petitioner may move to continue these proceedings. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This controversy seems to be principally a dispute between two attorneys at law who have dissolved partnership. It appears by the answer of the respondent that he has commenced an action against his former partner for an accounting and he claims that on that accounting a balance will be found due him. I am inclined to think that these proceedings should be suspended so as to give the respondent a reasonable time to bring on his action against his partner and thus have the dispute tried out in that action rather than in these proceedings. If the respondent fails to bring on that action for hearing within a reasonable time, or after the decision of the court in that action, the petitioner may move to continue these proceedings. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D. 887, 143 N.Y.S. 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thiele-nyappdiv-1913.