In re Thetford

Court of Appeals of Texas

In re Thetford

559 S.W.3d 187

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 15, 2017

DocketNO. 02–17–00182–CV

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 187 (In re Thetford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Thetford, 559 S.W.3d 187 (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*188The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Furthermore, our stay of the trial court proceedings in cause number 33186, styled Guardianship of Verna Francis Coley Thetford, an Incapacitated Person , pending in the 90th District Court of Young County, Texas, is hereby lifted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*188The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Furthermore, our stay of the trial court proceedings in cause number 33186, styled Guardianship of Verna Francis Coley Thetford, an Incapacitated Person , pending in the 90th District Court of Young County, Texas, is hereby lifted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thetford-texapp-2017.