In re Theodore T.
89 A.D.3d 643, 934 N.Y.2d 122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Theodore T.. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 A.D.3d 955 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2011·Published
Opinion
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The victim, who observed appellant on two occasions prior to, and on two occasions immediately after, the theft, reliably identified appellant as the person who walked away with his bicycle. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Theodore T., 89 A.D.3d 643, 934 N.Y.2d 122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 643 (In re Theodore T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)