In Re the Woodson Company, Debtor. Michael E. Woodson v. William B. Grover John W. Zellerbach the Woodson Co. "Opt-Out" Investors

Ninth Circuit

In Re the Woodson Company, Debtor. Michael E. Woodson v. William B. Grover John W. Zellerbach the Woodson Co. "Opt-Out" Investors

995 F.2d 235, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21235, 1993 WL 181384

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1993

Docket92-15010

StatusUnpublished

This text of 995 F.2d 235 (In Re the Woodson Company, Debtor. Michael E. Woodson v. William B. Grover John W. Zellerbach the Woodson Co. "Opt-Out" Investors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Woodson Company, Debtor. Michael E. Woodson v. William B. Grover John W. Zellerbach the Woodson Co. "Opt-Out" Investors, 995 F.2d 235, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21235, 1993 WL 181384 (9th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

995 F.2d 235

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re The WOODSON COMPANY, Debtor.
Michael E. WOODSON, Appellant,
v.
William B. GROVER; John W. Zellerbach; The Woodson Co.
"Opt-Out" Investors, Appellees.

No. 92-15010.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 1993.*
Decided May 27, 1993.

Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Michael E. Woodson appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP's) order denying his motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction of an appeal from a bankruptcy court order is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 158. Allen v. Old Nat'l Bank (In re Allen), 896 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam). Under section 158(b), the BAP has discretion to grant leave to appeal from interlocutory orders. Id. We, however, have no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the judgment of the BAP if the order of the bankruptcy court is interlocutory. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(d); Ryther v. Lumber Products, Inc. (In re Ryther), 799 F.2d 1412, 1414 (9th Cir.1986).

Here, the BAP denied leave to appeal from an interlocutory bankruptcy court order. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See id.

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

995 F.2d 235

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re The WOODSON COMPANY, Debtor.
Michael E. WOODSON, Appellant,
v.
William B. GROVER; John W. Zellerbach; The Woodson Co.
"Opt-Out" Investors, Appellees.

No. 92-15010.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 1993.*
Decided May 27, 1993.

Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Michael E. Woodson appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP's) order denying his motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction of an appeal from a bankruptcy court order is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 158. Allen v. Old Nat'l Bank (In re Allen), 896 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam). Under section 158(b), the BAP has discretion to grant leave to appeal from interlocutory orders. Id. We, however, have no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the judgment of the BAP if the order of the bankruptcy court is interlocutory. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(d); Ryther v. Lumber Products, Inc. (In re Ryther), 799 F.2d 1412, 1414 (9th Cir.1986).

Here, the BAP denied leave to appeal from an interlocutory bankruptcy court order. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See id.

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

995 F.2d 235, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21235, 1993 WL 181384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-woodson-company-debtor-michael-e-woodson-ca9-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack