In re the will of Stewart

New York Court of Chancery

In re the will of Stewart

11 Paige Ch. 398, 1845 N.Y. LEXIS 250

CourtNew York Court of Chancery

DecidedJanuary 7, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 Paige Ch. 398 (In re the will of Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the will of Stewart, 11 Paige Ch. 398, 1845 N.Y. LEXIS 250 (N.Y. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

This is an application to establish the, will of Sarah Stewart, late of Cleveland, in the state of Ohio, deceased, as a valid will both of real and personal property. [399]*399It appears by the testimony, that the testatrix was a feme covert, and was domiciled in the state of Ohio at the time .of executing her will and at the time of her death, and that the will was executed there, in the presence of two witnesses. She left real and personal property in the county of Onondaga; to which she was entitled as part of the estate of her deceased father. And it is established by the testimony that, by the laws of Ohio, the will of a feme covert is valid. There must, therefore, be a decree, declaring that the instrument propounded is duly proved and established as a valid will of the personal estate of the testatrix, wherever such estate is situated. And the will must be transmitted to the surrogate of the county of Onondaga, with directions to him to grant letters testamentary thereon, or letters of administration with the will annexed; in the same manner as if such will had been duly proved before him, as a will of personal estate.

The will of this feme covert, however, is not valid as a will of real property situated within this state. For the devise of such property is governed by the lex loci rei sitm. But it is valid as an appointment of real estate under a power, in relation to any real property which the decedent, by the laws of this state, was authorized to appoint or dispose of by will, under the provisions of the 110th section of the article of the revised statutes relative to powers. (1 R. S. 735.) If any of the real estate of the testatrix, therefore, was subject to such a power of appointment by devise or testamentary disposition, under the will of her father, or otherwise, the decree may also declare that this will of Mrs. Stewart was duly executed for that purpose; and may establish it as a valid will of real estate, to that extent, and direct that it be recorded as such. But as a feme covert has no power to devise lands here, except in the execution of such a power, the decree must declare that the will is not duly proved, as a will of the real property of the testatrix situated in the state of New-York; except so far as it may operate as an appointment of her real estate^ by will, under a valid power for that purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

This is an application to establish the, will of Sarah Stewart, late of Cleveland, in the state of Ohio, deceased, as a valid will both of real and personal property. [399]*399It appears by the testimony, that the testatrix was a feme covert, and was domiciled in the state of Ohio at the time .of executing her will and at the time of her death, and that the will was executed there, in the presence of two witnesses. She left real and personal property in the county of Onondaga; to which she was entitled as part of the estate of her deceased father. And it is established by the testimony that, by the laws of Ohio, the will of a feme covert is valid. There must, therefore, be a decree, declaring that the instrument propounded is duly proved and established as a valid will of the personal estate of the testatrix, wherever such estate is situated. And the will must be transmitted to the surrogate of the county of Onondaga, with directions to him to grant letters testamentary thereon, or letters of administration with the will annexed; in the same manner as if such will had been duly proved before him, as a will of personal estate.

The will of this feme covert, however, is not valid as a will of real property situated within this state. For the devise of such property is governed by the lex loci rei sitm. But it is valid as an appointment of real estate under a power, in relation to any real property which the decedent, by the laws of this state, was authorized to appoint or dispose of by will, under the provisions of the 110th section of the article of the revised statutes relative to powers. (1 R. S. 735.) If any of the real estate of the testatrix, therefore, was subject to such a power of appointment by devise or testamentary disposition, under the will of her father, or otherwise, the decree may also declare that this will of Mrs. Stewart was duly executed for that purpose; and may establish it as a valid will of real estate, to that extent, and direct that it be recorded as such. But as a feme covert has no power to devise lands here, except in the execution of such a power, the decree must declare that the will is not duly proved, as a will of the real property of the testatrix situated in the state of New-York; except so far as it may operate as an appointment of her real estate^ by will, under a valid power for that purpose.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Paige Ch. 398, 1845 N.Y. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-will-of-stewart-nychanct-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack