In Re the Will of Peacock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

In Re the Will of Peacock

197 S.E.2d 254, 18 N.C. App. 554, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1935

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJune 27, 1973

Docket7311SC292

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 197 S.E.2d 254 (In Re the Will of Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Will of Peacock, 197 S.E.2d 254, 18 N.C. App. 554, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1935 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

Under certain circumstances, one who accepts and retains benefits under a will may thereby become estopped to attack its validity. Annot: Will Contest—Estoppel, 28 A.L.R. 2d 116. Such is not the present case. One cannot be estopped by accepting that which he would be legally entitled to receive in any event. 28 Am. Jur. 2d, Estoppel and Waiver, § 60, p. 680. Should the will be set aside in the present case, appellant will be entitled to a full one-third of his mother’s estate. His acceptance of a check for less than that amount could in no way prejudice his sisters in event probate of the will is subsequently set aside. Nothing in the circumstances indicates any reason why it would be inequitable for appellant to proceed with his caveat. Should he succeed, he will ultimately receive no more than the law will allot him; should he fail, he will receive no more than the trustees in proper perfomance of their duties under his mother’s will may distribute to him. His caveat having been timely filed under G.S. 31-32 and no sufficient grounds for estoppel being shown, the summary judgment dismissing this proceeding is

Reversed.

Judges Brock and Morris concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, Judge.

Under certain circumstances, one who accepts and retains benefits under a will may thereby become estopped to attack its validity. Annot: Will Contest—Estoppel, 28 A.L.R. 2d 116. Such is not the present case. One cannot be estopped by accepting that which he would be legally entitled to receive in any event. 28 Am. Jur. 2d, Estoppel and Waiver, § 60, p. 680. Should the will be set aside in the present case, appellant will be entitled to a full one-third of his mother’s estate. His acceptance of a check for less than that amount could in no way prejudice his sisters in event probate of the will is subsequently set aside. Nothing in the circumstances indicates any reason why it would be inequitable for appellant to proceed with his caveat. Should he succeed, he will ultimately receive no more than the law will allot him; should he fail, he will receive no more than the trustees in proper perfomance of their duties under his mother’s will may distribute to him. His caveat having been timely filed under G.S. 31-32 and no sufficient grounds for estoppel being shown, the summary judgment dismissing this proceeding is

Reversed.

Judges Brock and Morris concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 S.E.2d 254, 18 N.C. App. 554, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-will-of-peacock-ncctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack