In re the Westchester County Bar Ass'n

243 A.D. 621
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Report of official referee confirmed, respondent disbarred and his name ordered struck from the roll of attorneys. An attorney in a disciplinary proceeding should be frank and truthful and freely admit facts that are obvious, instead of giving specious explanations and excuses and being untruthful in respect to his derelictions. In adopting the former attitude, evidence of previous good conduct and the stress of circumstances attending his delinquencies, and testimony as to his general good character may be considered in respect to the discipline to be imposed. Such considerations have little influence when the latter named conditions are present. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Westchester County Bar Ass'n, 243 A.D. 621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 621 (In re the Westchester County Bar Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Zaslav
21 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)