In re the Welfare of M.S.E.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

In re the Welfare of M.S.E.

389 N.W.2d 523, 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4451

CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota

DecidedJune 17, 1986

DocketNo. C1-86-84

StatusPublished

This text of 389 N.W.2d 523 (In re the Welfare of M.S.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Welfare of M.S.E., 389 N.W.2d 523, 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4451 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The facts of this case are adequately stated in Edwards v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 381 N.W.2d 27 (Minn.Ct.App.1986).

In Edwards, this court held that the arresting officer had probable cause to believe appellant was driving under the influence. Id. at 30. We affirm that decision.

We also held in Edwards that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding that appellant was driving under the influence. Id. We also affirm that decision.

Finally, appellant contends that his constitutional right against self-incrimination was violated when the officer asked him if he was driving without giving a Miranda warning. Such a contention is meritless. See State v. Herem, 384 N.W.2d 880 (Minn.1986); State v. Kline, 351 N.W.2d 388 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).

DECISION

The trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI