In re the Voluntary Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Voluntary Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lee

254 A.D. 902, 5 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 902 (In re the Voluntary Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Voluntary Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lee, 254 A.D. 902, 5 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decrees of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk county, in so far as they fail to provide for the payment of interest on the legacy of the appellant. Decree and supplemental decree modified by adding to each a provision for the [903]*903payment of interest on the legacy to the Century Association from December 23, 1932. As so modified, the decrees, in so far as an appeal is taken, are unanimously affirmed, with costs, payable out of the estate, to all parties appearing and filing briefs, and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court to enter decree accordingly. The legatee was entitled to the benefit of the general rule that interest was payable on the legacy seven months after the issuance of letters testamentary. The facts here do not come within the exception to that rule as stated in the cases. (Surr. Ct. Act, § 218; Matter of Butherfurd, 196 N. Y. 311; Matter of Erring, 103 App. Div. 501.) Appeal from order denying legatee’s motion dismissed, without costs. Present — Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decrees of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk county, in so far as they fail to provide for the payment of interest on the legacy of the appellant. Decree and supplemental decree modified by adding to each a provision for the [903]*903payment of interest on the legacy to the Century Association from December 23, 1932. As so modified, the decrees, in so far as an appeal is taken, are unanimously affirmed, with costs, payable out of the estate, to all parties appearing and filing briefs, and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court to enter decree accordingly. The legatee was entitled to the benefit of the general rule that interest was payable on the legacy seven months after the issuance of letters testamentary. The facts here do not come within the exception to that rule as stated in the cases. (Surr. Ct. Act, § 218; Matter of Butherfurd, 196 N. Y. 311; Matter of Erring, 103 App. Div. 501.) Appeal from order denying legatee’s motion dismissed, without costs. Present — Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 902, 5 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-voluntary-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-proceedings-of-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack