In re the Unauthorized Practice of the Law by Estes

186 Wash. 690
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMay 19, 1936
DocketNo. C. D. 2159
StatusPublished

This text of 186 Wash. 690 (In re the Unauthorized Practice of the Law by Estes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Unauthorized Practice of the Law by Estes, 186 Wash. 690 (Wash. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding in contempt, and has been argued with, and submitted at the same time as, In re McCallum, ante p. 312, 57 P. (2d) 1259. In this case, the defendant, not a licensed attorney, has been engaged in business as a real estate and fire insurance agent at White Salmon, Klickitat county, Washington, for twenty-five years. It appears he was never advised, and hence did not know, that the preparation of deeds, mortgages, contracts, bills of sale, etc., for others for compensation, constituted the practice of law. It also appears that he never received any notice from the Washington State Bar Association, or anyone, claiming that such business amounted to the practice of law.

This case, in all essential particulars, is similar to the companion case just referred to, upon the authority of which this case is dismissed, without prejudice to proceedings by any other remedy provided by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Unauthorized Practice of the Law by McCallum
57 P.2d 1259 (Washington Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 Wash. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-unauthorized-practice-of-the-law-by-estes-wash-1936.