In re the Trust Estate of Holt

Hawaii Supreme Court

In re the Trust Estate of Holt

24 Haw. 663, 1919 Haw. LEXIS 66

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 14, 1919

DocketNo. 1157

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 24 Haw. 663 (In re the Trust Estate of Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Trust Estate of Holt, 24 Haw. 663, 1919 Haw. LEXIS 66 (haw 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from the order of the circuit judge of the first circuit allowing an attorney’s fee of fifty dollars for services rendered the trustee in the collection of certain rents, as charged by the trustee in its annual accounts, the appellant claiming that the amount so paid should have been charged to and collected from the beneficiaries of said estate who were solely benefited [664]*664by such collection. The record presented to this court is so incomplete and unsatisfactory as to render any decision upon the subject purely conjectural.

AcM & AcM for appellant. B. L. Maros {Frear, Prosser, Anderson & Maros on the brief) for the trustee.

The appeal is therefore dismissed and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from the order of the circuit judge of the first circuit allowing an attorney’s fee of fifty dollars for services rendered the trustee in the collection of certain rents, as charged by the trustee in its annual accounts, the appellant claiming that the amount so paid should have been charged to and collected from the beneficiaries of said estate who were solely benefited [664]*664by such collection. The record presented to this court is so incomplete and unsatisfactory as to render any decision upon the subject purely conjectural.

AcM & AcM for appellant. B. L. Maros {Frear, Prosser, Anderson & Maros on the brief) for the trustee.

The appeal is therefore dismissed and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Haw. 663, 1919 Haw. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-trust-estate-of-holt-haw-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack