In re the Trust Estate of Holt

24 Haw. 663, 1919 Haw. LEXIS 66
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 14, 1919·No. No. 1157·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from the order of the circuit judge of the first circuit allowing an attorney’s fee of fifty dollars for services rendered the trustee in the collection of certain rents, as charged by the trustee in its annual accounts, the appellant claiming that the amount so paid should have been charged to and collected from the beneficiaries of said estate who were solely benefited [664] by such collection. The record presented to this court is so incomplete and unsatisfactory as to render any decision upon the subject purely conjectural.

AcM & AcM for appellant. B. L. Maros {Frear, Prosser, Anderson & Maros on the brief) for the trustee.

The appeal is therefore dismissed and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Trust Estate of Holt, 24 Haw. 663, 1919 Haw. LEXIS 66 (haw 1919).

24 Haw. 663 (In re the Trust Estate of Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ornellas
375 P.2d 1 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1962)
Schnack v. City of Honolulu
41 Haw. 219 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1955)
Powell v. Powell
40 Haw. 625 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1954)
In Re the Estate of Chuck
33 Haw. 445 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1935)