In re the Trust Estate of Hiss

1 Balt. C. Rep. 161
CourtBaltimore City Circuit Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 161 (In re the Trust Estate of Hiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Trust Estate of Hiss, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 161 (Md. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

DENNIS, J.

With the exception of the objection to the allowance to the trustee of two and a-half per cent, commissions on the investment of the trust funds made under the order of Court, all the exceptions which have been filed raise questions which were or could have been raised, under the creditor’s bill filed by Arnold Ounstable & Co., and which bill has been dismissed, hence the exceptions are estopped. Trayheen vs. Colburn, executor, 66 Md. 277.

The commissions allowed the trustee for investment under the order of Court were properly allowed. It has been the uniform practice of this Court, when a trustee is directed to make an investment of trust funds pending a litigation or when he applies for authority to make such investment, to allow him two and one-half per cent, on such investment and no reason has been shown why in this case that practice should be departed from. The five per cent, commissions allowed him was for the general management and settlement of the estate and does not include the allowance for such special service as the purchase of proper securities for investment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trayhern v. Colburn
7 A. 459 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Balt. C. Rep. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-trust-estate-of-hiss-mdcirctctbalt-1891.