In re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright

395 N.W.2d 726, 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4953
CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 10, 1986
DocketNo. C5-86-895
StatusPublished

This text of 395 N.W.2d 726 (In re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright, 395 N.W.2d 726, 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4953 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant Ana Gutierrez’s petition for attorney’s fees incurred by unsuccessfully opposing a petition to terminate a trust of which she was a beneficiary. We affirm.

The district court granted respondent Michael Mattox’s petition to terminate the trust, but this court reversed and awarded Gutierrez attorney’s fees. In re Trust of Boright, 359 N.W.2d 647 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). The supreme court reversed that decision and vacated the award of attorney’s fees. In re Trust of Boright, 377 N.W.2d 9 (Minn.1985).

Gutierrez then petitioned the district court for attorney’s fees. The district court denied the petition, and Gutierrez brought this appeal.

We agree with respondent that the issue of attorney’s fees was decided by the supreme court on its merits in In re Trust of Boright, 377 N.W.2d 9 (Minn.1985). The court stated:

Finally, although Gutierrez’s position on appeal was consistent with a defense of the trust, it cannot be said that she was obliged to undertake the trustee’s role for the protection of the donor’s intention. Accordingly, the award to Gutierrez of attorneys fees, which she had not requested of the district court, is vacated.

377 N.W.2d at 14.

It is clear from the language of the supreme court decision that Gutierrez was not entitled to attorney’s fees since she had not met the substantive criteria for an award, not because she had failed to request them from the district court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright
377 N.W.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright
359 N.W.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 N.W.2d 726, 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-trust-established-under-trust-agreement-of-boright-minnctapp-1986.