In re the Town of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Town of Huntington

31 A.D.2d 759, 298 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 759 (In re the Town of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Town of Huntington, 31 A.D.2d 759, 298 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, final order of .the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 16, 1967, affirmed insofar as appealed from by the several appellants, upon the opinions of the learned Trial Justice. Pursuant to CPLR 8107 and section 29 of the Suffolk County Improvement Act (L. 1927, ch. 190; L. 1929, ch. 587; as amd.), we grant full appeal costs and disbursements against the town and in favor of each claimant or set of claimants filing separate briefs, except that, in addition, full appeal costs and disbursements are granted to Justine L. Lambert against Empire State Development Co. as to the appeal concerning their title dispute to specified parcels. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, final order of .the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 16, 1967, affirmed insofar as appealed from by the several appellants, upon the opinions of the learned Trial Justice. Pursuant to CPLR 8107 and section 29 of the Suffolk County Improvement Act (L. 1927, ch. 190; L. 1929, ch. 587; as amd.), we grant full appeal costs and disbursements against the town and in favor of each claimant or set of claimants filing separate briefs, except that, in addition, full appeal costs and disbursements are granted to Justine L. Lambert against Empire State Development Co. as to the appeal concerning their title dispute to specified parcels. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 759, 298 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-town-of-huntington-nyappdiv-1969.