in Re: The Town of Flower Mound, Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 8, 2019·No. 05-19-00460-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed July 8, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00460-CV

IN RE THE TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17756

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg This proceeding involves a question of dominant jurisdiction between a first-filed suit in

Denton County and the underlying proceeding. The trial court granted a plea in abatement in favor

of the Denton County suit. In this original proceeding, The Town of Flower Mound, Texas seeks

a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its abatement order and reinstate the case.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must demonstrate that the trial court clearly

abused its discretion and the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co.

of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). A trial court clearly abuses its

discretion if “it reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and

prejudicial error of law” or if it clearly fails to analyze or apply the law correctly. In re Cerberus

Capital Mgmt. L.P., 164 S.W.3d 379, 382 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (quoting

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992)). “[A] relator need only establish a trial

court’s abuse of discretion to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief with regard to a plea in abatement in a dominant-jurisdiction case.” In re J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 492 S.W.3d 287, 299–

300 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not

shown it is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines

relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

190460F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: The Town of Flower Mound, Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re: The Town of Flower Mound, Texas (in Re: The Town of Flower Mound, Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.
164 S.W.3d 379 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
In re J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
492 S.W.3d 287 (Texas Supreme Court, 2016)