In re the Termination of Parental Rights & Appointment of a Guardian for Hutton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

In re the Termination of Parental Rights & Appointment of a Guardian for Hutton

785 S.W.2d 33, 301 Ark. 538, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 131

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 12, 1990

Docket88-274

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 785 S.W.2d 33 (In re the Termination of Parental Rights & Appointment of a Guardian for Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Termination of Parental Rights & Appointment of a Guardian for Hutton, 785 S.W.2d 33, 301 Ark. 538, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 131 (Ark. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On July 29,1988, the Benton County Probate Court entered an order finding that custody of the petitioners’ children should continue with the Department of Human Services for foster care placement and that Human Services should proceed with a petition for guardianship with authority to consent to adoption. Petitioners appealed to this court, and on September 12, 1988, we granted petitioners’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered that the transcript be furnished at the State’s expense.

On March 20,1989, we reversed the decision of the probate court and remanded the case for further proceedings. According to the petitioners, a hearing was held on October 10,1989, in the Benton County Chancery Court, and on January 2, 1990, the court ordered that the petitioners’ children be taken from them and placed for adoption in a suitable home, or placed in long term foster care until an adoptive home could be found.

Petitioners appeal the court’s decision and make a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, for filing fees, for costs for transcription of the October 10,1989, hearing, and for attorney’s fees as allowed under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316 (Supp. 1989). To be consistent with our action taken in the first appeal, we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for filing fees and order the State to pay costs of transcription. However, we remand for a determination by the trial court as to the petitioners’ entitlement to attorney’s fees from the Juvenile Court Representation Fund as prescribed by Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316 (Supp. 1989).

Price, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On July 29,1988, the Benton County Probate Court entered an order finding that custody of the petitioners’ children should continue with the Department of Human Services for foster care placement and that Human Services should proceed with a petition for guardianship with authority to consent to adoption. Petitioners appealed to this court, and on September 12, 1988, we granted petitioners’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered that the transcript be furnished at the State’s expense.

On March 20,1989, we reversed the decision of the probate court and remanded the case for further proceedings. According to the petitioners, a hearing was held on October 10,1989, in the Benton County Chancery Court, and on January 2, 1990, the court ordered that the petitioners’ children be taken from them and placed for adoption in a suitable home, or placed in long term foster care until an adoptive home could be found.

Petitioners appeal the court’s decision and make a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, for filing fees, for costs for transcription of the October 10,1989, hearing, and for attorney’s fees as allowed under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316 (Supp. 1989). To be consistent with our action taken in the first appeal, we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for filing fees and order the State to pay costs of transcription. However, we remand for a determination by the trial court as to the petitioners’ entitlement to attorney’s fees from the Juvenile Court Representation Fund as prescribed by Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316 (Supp. 1989).

Price, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 S.W.2d 33, 301 Ark. 538, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-termination-of-parental-rights-appointment-of-a-guardian-for-ark-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack