In Re: The Tax Appeal of Palmer-Lasky v. City and County of Honolulu

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 18, 2024
DocketCAAP-24-0000397
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: The Tax Appeal of Palmer-Lasky v. City and County of Honolulu (In Re: The Tax Appeal of Palmer-Lasky v. City and County of Honolulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: The Tax Appeal of Palmer-Lasky v. City and County of Honolulu, (hawapp 2024).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 18-SEP-2024 07:54 AM Dkt. 49 OAWST NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

IN THE MATTER OF THE TAX APPEAL OF WESLEY PALMER-LASKY and JACQUELINE PALMER-LASKY, Appellants-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE TAX APPEAL COURT (CASE NO. 1TX171001379)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.) Upon consideration of the September 13, 2024

Stipulation and Dismissal of Appeal with Prejudice (Stipulation),

filed by Appellee-Appellee City and County of Honolulu (City),

the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the

appeal has been docketed and the filing fees have been paid; (2)

under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), the

parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, with each

party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the

Stipulation is dated and signed by both self-represented

Appellants-Appellants, and by counsel for the City; and (4)

dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is

approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice, under HRAP NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Rule 42(b). The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and

costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, September 18, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: The Tax Appeal of Palmer-Lasky v. City and County of Honolulu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-tax-appeal-of-palmer-lasky-v-city-and-county-of-honolulu-hawapp-2024.