In re the Summary Proceedings by Norton
212 A.D. 845
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that even though the contract of sale may have been abandoned the conventional relation of landlord and tenant did not exist and that a summary proceeding is, therefore, an improper remedy under the authority of Evertson v. Sutton (5 Wend. 281); Benjamin v. Benjamin (5 N. Y. 383) and People ex rel. Mitchell v. Simpson (28 id. 55).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Summary Proceedings by Norton, 212 A.D. 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
212 A.D. 845 (In re the Summary Proceedings by Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevens v. Nye
283 A.D. 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Nieberg
164 Misc. 618 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)