In re the Succession of McIlhenney

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re the Succession of McIlhenney

787 So. 2d 282, 2001 La. LEXIS 1147, 2001 WL 491926

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 4, 2001·No. No. 2001-CD-0636·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM *.

Application granted. The case is remanded to the court of appeal with instructions to treat the writ application as a devolutive appeal from an appealable judgment. See e.g., Stein v. Martin, 97-0287 (La.3/27/97), 691 So.2d 674; see La.Code Civ. P. art. 865.

KIMBALL, JOHNSON, and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM *.

Application granted. The case is remanded to the court of appeal with instructions to treat the writ application as a devolutive appeal from an appealable judgment. See e.g., Stein v. Martin, 97-0287 (La.3/27/97), 691 So.2d 674; see La.Code Civ. P. art. 865.

KIMBALL, JOHNSON, and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ.

Footnotes

In re the Succession of McIlhenney, 787 So. 2d 282, 2001 La. LEXIS 1147, 2001 WL 491926 (La. 2001).

Pincite

787 So. 2d 282 (In re the Succession of McIlhenney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related