in Re the State of Texas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re the State of Texas. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7430
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 2006·No. 02-06-00106-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-06-106-CV

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

OPINION ON REHEARING (footnote: 1)

Before the Court is relator’s motion for rehearing to clarify our prior opinion regarding the payment of costs.  We grant the motion, withdraw our opinion of April 17, 2006, and substitute the following.

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Costs of this original proceeding shall be borne by the party incurring same.

PER CURIAM

PANEL B: GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 11, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

in Re the State of Texas (in Re the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.