in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez
This text of in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez (in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-22-00404-CV
IN RE THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY and Roberto HERNANDEZ
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 3, 2022
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On July 1, 2022, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators also filed an
emergency motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition
for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators
are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ emergency motion for stay is DENIED as moot. 2
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI25249, styled Marcos Acosta v. Roberto Hernandez and The Sherwin-Williams Company, pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tina Torres presiding. 2 On July 6, 2022, this court issued an order denying relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-sherwin-williams-company-roberto-hernandez-texapp-2022.