in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 3, 2022·No. 04-22-00404-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00404-CV

IN RE THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY and Roberto HERNANDEZ

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 3, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 1, 2022, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators also filed an

emergency motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition

for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators

are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ emergency motion for stay is DENIED as moot. 2

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI25249, styled Marcos Acosta v. Roberto Hernandez and The Sherwin-Williams Company, pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tina Torres presiding. 2 On July 6, 2022, this court issued an order denying relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez (in Re the Sherwin-Williams Company & Roberto Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.