In re the Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Goldberg
This text of 243 A.D. 707 (In re the Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county denying motion for examination of the administrator before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs; examination to proceed at a time and place to be stated in the order. The examination sought relates to the affairs of the estate of Bertha Goldberg and the knowledge respecting those affairs possessed by the administrator, Samuel P. Goldberg, as such. It was, therefore, an examination that should have been allowed in the exercise of sound legal discretion. (Nagel v. Nagel, 242 App. Div. 845.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-settlement-of-the-account-of-proceedings-of-goldberg-nyappdiv-1935.