In Re the Rules of Professional Con

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 2016
Docket09-0688
StatusPublished

This text of In Re the Rules of Professional Con (In Re the Rules of Professional Con) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Rules of Professional Con, (Mo. 2016).

Opinion

09/22/2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: AF 09-0688

AF 09-0688 _________________

IN RE THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL ORDER CONDUCT _________________

The State Bar of Montana Board of Trustees petitioned this Court to revise portions of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct to provide guidance regarding lawyers’ use of technology. The proposed revisions affect the Preamble, Rule 1.0 on Terminology defining “writing,” Rule 1.6 on Confidentiality, and Rule 4.4(b) on Respect for Rights of Third Persons. The Court allowed a public comment period on the proposals. At a September 20, 2016 public meeting, the Court voted to adopt the revisions as proposed by the Montana Board of Trustees. In addition, the Court discussed a new subsection to Rule 4.4, proposed by the State Bar Ethics Committee. The Court voted to accept public comment on that proposed new subsection 4.4(c), which would read as follows: A lawyer shall not knowingly access or use electronically stored information in a communication or document received from another lawyer, for the purpose of discovering protected work product, privileged or other confidential information unless the receiving lawyer has obtained permission to do so from the author of the communication or document. Communication or document as used in this rule excludes documents produced in discovery and information that is the subject of criminal investigation.

IT IS ORDERED that the above-referenced revisions to the Preamble, Rule 1.0, Rule 1.6, and Rule 4.4(b) of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct are ADOPTED, effective January 1, 2017. The revisions are reflected in the complete text of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct which are appended to this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will accept public comment on the above proposed new 4.4(c) of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court directs the State Bar’s Ethics and Technology Committees to confer and submit additional comment on the proposal within the time allowed. Comments must be filed in writing with the Clerk of this Court on or before October 31, 2016. This Order shall be published on the Montana Supreme Court website and notice of this Order shall be posted on the website of the State Bar of Montana and in the next available issue of the Montana Lawyer. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the Montana State Law Library, the State Bar of Montana, and the Chairs of the Ethics and Technology Committees. Dated this 22nd day of September, 2016.

/S/ MIKE McGRATH /S/ BETH BAKER /S/ JIM RICE /S/ PATRICIA COTTER /S/ JAMES JEREMIAH SHEA /S/ MICHAEL E WHEAT /S/ LAURIE McKINNON

2 MONTANA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

PREAMBLE: A LAWYER’S RESPONSIBILITIES (1) A lawyer shall always pursue the truth. (2) A lawyer, as a member of the legal profession, is a representative of clients, an officer of the legal system and a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice. (3) As a representative of clients, a lawyer performs various functions. In performance of any functions a lawyer shall behave consistently with the requirements of honest dealings with others. As advisor, a lawyer endeavors to provide a client with an informed understanding of the client’s legal rights and obligations and explains their practical implications. As advocate, a lawyer asserts the client’s position under the rules of the adversary system. As negotiator, a lawyer seeks a result advantageous to the client but consistent with requirements under these Rules of honest dealings with others. As an evaluator, a lawyer acts by examining a client’s legal affairs and reporting about them. (4) In addition to these representational functions, a lawyer may serve as a third-party neutral, a nonrepresentational role helping the parties to resolve a dispute or other matter. Some of these Rules apply directly to lawyers who are or have served as third-party neutrals. See, e.g., Rules 1.12 and 2.3. In addition, there are Rules that apply to lawyers who are not active in the practice of law or to practicing lawyers even when they are acting in a nonprofessional capacity. For example, a lawyer who commits fraud in the conduct of a business is subject to discipline for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. See Rule 8.4. (5) In all professional functions a lawyer should be competent, prompt and diligent. Competence implies an obligation to keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology. A lawyer should maintain communication with a client concerning the representation. A lawyer should keep in confidence information relating to representation of a client except so far as disclosure is required or permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law. (6) A lawyer’s conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in professional service to clients and in the lawyer’s business and personal affairs. A lawyer should use the law’s procedures only for legitimate purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers and public officials. While it is a lawyer’s duty, when necessary, to challenge the rectitude of official action, it is also a lawyer’s duty to uphold legal process. (7) As a public citizen, a lawyer should seek improvement of the law, access to the legal system, the administration of justice and the quality of service rendered by the legal profession. As a member of a learned profession, a lawyer should cultivate knowledge of the law beyond its use for clients, employ that knowledge in reform of the law and work to strengthen legal education. In addition, a lawyer should further the public’s understanding of and confidence in the rule of law and the justice system because legal institutions in a constitutional democracy depend on popular participation and support to

1 maintain their authority. A lawyer should be mindful of deficiencies in the administration of justice and of the fact that the poor, and sometimes persons who are not poor, cannot afford adequate legal assistance. Therefore, all lawyers should devote professional time and resources and use civic influence to ensure equal access to our system of justice for all those who because of economic or social barriers cannot afford or secure adequate legal counsel. A lawyer should aid the legal profession in pursuing these objectives and should help the bar regulate itself in the public interest. (8) Many of a lawyer’s professional responsibilities are prescribed in the Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as substantive and procedural law. However, a lawyer is also guided by personal conscience and the approbation of professional peers. A lawyer should strive to attain the highest level of skill, to improve the law and the legal profession and to exemplify the legal profession’s ideals of public service. (9) A lawyer’s responsibilities as a representative of clients, an officer of the legal system and a public citizen are harmonious. A lawyer can be a dedicated advocate on behalf of a client, even an unpopular one, but in doing so must comply with these Rules of Professional Conduct. So also, a lawyer can be sure that preserving client confidences ordinarily serves the public interest because people are more likely to seek legal advice, and thereby heed their legal obligations, when they know their communications will be private. (10) In the nature of law practice, however, conflicting responsibilities are encountered. Virtually all difficult ethical problems arise from conflict between a lawyer’s responsibilities to clients, to the legal system and to the lawyer’s own interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re the Rules of Professional Con, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-rules-of-professional-con-mont-2016.