In re the Revoke Letters Testamentary Issued to Fribourg

250 A.D. 503
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1937·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although we find no act of dishonesty on the part of the appellant executors nor that any loss has resulted from their administration of the estate from the acts complained of, yet upon the conceded violation in two series of transactions of subdivision 7 of section 104 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, it cannot be said that the action of the surrogate in removing them constituted an improper exercise of discretion. It follows that the decree, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Revoke Letters Testamentary Issued to Fribourg, 250 A.D. 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 503 (In re the Revoke Letters Testamentary Issued to Fribourg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Duke
663 N.E.2d 602 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
DePicabia v. Chester National Bank
50 A.D.2d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Accounting of Steinecke
201 Misc. 890 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)
In re the Estate of Block
186 Misc. 945 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1946)
In re the Estate of Sears
176 Misc. 242 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
In re the Estate of Israel
166 Misc. 156 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)