In re the Removal of Schmidt

191 N.W. 939, 154 Minn. 539, 1923 Minn. LEXIS 678
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 26, 1923·No. No. 23,369·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition with an order requiring respondent, Carl B. Schmidt, to appear and answer the charge made therein having been duly served, respondent appeared by his attorney, Leslie C. Smith, as did also Mr. V. C. Pidgeon for the petitioner, who offered in evidence a certified copy of a conviction of said respondent of the crime of subornation of perjury as alleged in the petition.

Now having considered the argument presented 'by respondent, and finding the charge made in the petition true,

It Is Ordered that judgment be entered removing said Carl B. Schmidt, also known as Carl B. Smith, from the office of an attorney at law, and striking his name from the roll of attorneys entitled to practice in the courts of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Removal of Schmidt, 191 N.W. 939, 154 Minn. 539, 1923 Minn. LEXIS 678 (Mich. 1923).

191 N.W. 939 (In re the Removal of Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Discipline of Kraemer
361 N.W.2d 402 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)
Matter of Kimmel
322 N.W.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
In re the Disciplinary Action against Kimmel
322 N.W.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
In Re Disbarment of John G. Priebe
290 N.W. 552 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1940)