In re the Reinstatement of Briggs
2002 OK 55, 49 P.3d 737, 2002 WL 1316204
Opinion
ORDER
1 1 On de novo consideration of the paperwork on file and of the transeript and record of proceedings before the Professional Responsibility Tribunal's assigned trial panel, the court finds that the applicant established by clear and convincing proof that:
(1) he is a person of ethical fitness,
(2) he has not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law since 27 June 1995 when his name was stricken from the Roll of Attorneys for noncompliance with mandatory continuing legal education requirements and for non-payment of dues, and
(8) the applicant faithfully continued to follow current developments in the law and is sufficiently abreast of intervening changes to qualify for reinstatement without examination.
4 2 The applicant's license to practice law in the State of Oklahoma shall stand reinstated upon his payment of the assessed costs of this proceeding in the sum of $522.28.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Reinstatement of Briggs, 2002 OK 55, 49 P.3d 737, 2002 WL 1316204 (Okla. 2002).
2002 OK 55 (In re the Reinstatement of Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
OKLAHOMA SCHOOLS RISK MANAGEMENT TRUST v. LEXINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2026