In re the Rehabilitation of the Lawyers Mortgage Co.

New York Supreme Court

In re the Rehabilitation of the Lawyers Mortgage Co.

167 Misc. 9, 3 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1202

DecidedNovember 23, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 167 Misc. 9 (In re the Rehabilitation of the Lawyers Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Rehabilitation of the Lawyers Mortgage Co., 167 Misc. 9, 3 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1202 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Frankentiialer, J.

Motion has been withdrawn except as to the claim for $969.81. This sum was appropriated by the rehabilitator to reimburse the company for interest advances. At the time of this appropriation the company’s financial condition and status were such that the rehabilitator could not properly use funds derived from the owner of the property to reimburse the company for previous interest advances. The fact that the fund from which the $969.81 was withdrawn by the rehabilitator did not represent the proceeds of an assignment of rents or a net rent agreement, although it would have been material had the recoupment been made while the company was a going concern conducting its business in a normal manner (Matter of People [Lawyers Title & Guar. Co.], 265 N. Y. 20, 27, 28), is immaterial where, as here, the recoupment occurs after the company has gone into rehabilitation. The motion is, accordingly, granted to the extent that it has not been withdrawn. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankentiialer, J.

Motion has been withdrawn except as to the claim for $969.81. This sum was appropriated by the rehabilitator to reimburse the company for interest advances. At the time of this appropriation the company’s financial condition and status were such that the rehabilitator could not properly use funds derived from the owner of the property to reimburse the company for previous interest advances. The fact that the fund from which the $969.81 was withdrawn by the rehabilitator did not represent the proceeds of an assignment of rents or a net rent agreement, although it would have been material had the recoupment been made while the company was a going concern conducting its business in a normal manner (Matter of People [Lawyers Title & Guar. Co.], 265 N. Y. 20, 27, 28), is immaterial where, as here, the recoupment occurs after the company has gone into rehabilitation. The motion is, accordingly, granted to the extent that it has not been withdrawn. Settle order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 Misc. 9, 3 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-rehabilitation-of-the-lawyers-mortgage-co-nysupct-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack