In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Johannson

2004 ND 84, 678 N.W.2d 755, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 181, 2004 WL 816806
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 2004
Docket20040102
StatusPublished

This text of 2004 ND 84 (In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Johannson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Johannson, 2004 ND 84, 678 N.W.2d 755, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 181, 2004 WL 816806 (N.D. 2004).

Opinion

SUSPENSION ORDERED

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] On April 12, 2004, the Disciplinary Board notified the Supreme Court under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4 that it was recommending the reciprocal discipline of Kenneth F. Johannson, a member of the bar of the State of North Dakota.

[¶ 2] The Record reflects that an Order suspending Johannson for violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.8(k), which provides a lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a current client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the lawyer-client relationship commenced, was filed by the Minnesota Supreme Court on March 9, 2004, and a certified copy of the Order was filed by the Secretary of the Disciplinary Board on March 18, 2004.

[¶ 3] The Record further reflects that on March 25, 2004, Disciplinary Counsel served Notice pursuant to N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl 4.4(B) on H. Patrick Weir, Attorney for Johannson, by certified mail, return receipt requested; the return receipt was signed on March 26, 2004.

[¶ 4] Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(B) Johannson was given notice that a certified copy of the Order of suspension filed by the Minnesota Supreme Court was received, and he had 30 days to file any claim that the imposition of the identical discipline in North Dakota would be unwarranted and the reasons for the claim.

[¶ 5] By letter dated March 29, 2004, Johannson agreed to identical discipline as imposed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota. Johannson waived any due process defenses based upon lack of an identical North Dakota rule, and requested the suspension run .concurrent with the dates of the Minnesota suspension.

[¶ 6] Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(D), the Disciplinary Board forwarded its recommendation that Johannson be suspended from the practice of law for 90 days, to run concurrent with the suspension imposed by the Minnesota Supreme Court, and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $250. The Court considered the matter, and

[¶ 7] ORDERED, Kenneth F. Johann-son is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 90 days, effective March 23, 2004.

[¶ 8] FURTHER ORDERED, Kenneth F. Johannson pay the costs and expenses of- the disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $250, payable to the Secretary of the Disciplinary Board.

[¶ 9] FURTHER ORDERED, Kenneth F. Johannson comply with N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.3.

[¶ 10] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, MARY MUEHLEN MARING and WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, JJ., concur. [¶ 11] The Honorable CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, deeming herself disqualified, did .not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 ND 84, 678 N.W.2d 755, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 181, 2004 WL 816806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-reciprocal-discipline-of-johannson-nd-2004.